The View from Hell

Just another WordPress.com site

Transdimensional Justice Monster

with 11 comments

From Wikipedia, 2108 C.E.:

For the band, see Transdimensional Justice Monster (band).

The phrase “transdimensional justice monster” refers to an as-yet-hypothetical device for ensuring that a newly-created universe is ethical. Interest in the development of a functional TJM has increased in recent megaseconds, largely due to rumors that the moratorium on the creation of gladiator universes may be extended to market universes.

Gladiator universes, such as the universe underlying our own base reality,* are universes in which sentient beings with non-identical goals exist and compete, whose ultimate mechanism for distribution of utility between beings is the use of force. Research into the ancient problem of welfare comparison between sentient beings has produced several conceptions of non-gladiator interpersonal justice; the TJM is merely a continuation of this endeavor.

Market universes attempt to resolve the problem of distributing scarce resources among sentient beings by requiring mutual consent for transfers. Markets may be seen as an early human attempt to simulate the TJM; this hypothesis is supported by the reification of the market in the figurative term “the invisible hand.”

Recently, so-called Rawls universes have been proposed as a more ethical alternative to market universes. To create a Rawls universe, a universe creator would be required to enter his own universe and live out his life inside it, but would be assigned randomly to a body within this newly-created universe. Critics argue that this does not ensure justice, as requiring a universe creator to be born into a single life in his universe fails to ensure that he adequately internalize the aggregate risk faced by his entire created population over all its generations. In addition, the particular values of the universe creator are unlikely to adequately predict the values of new beings in new universes.

The TJM avoids the problems of market universes and Rawls universes alike. A transdimensional justice monster envelops and, in a sense, becomes all the experiencing beings in a given universe at once. While the TJM feels the happiness and pain of all its sub-beings, it also retains the capacity to experience their loneliness and alienation as they each experience it. Since the TJM experiences everything that its sub-beings do, when the TJM makes a transfer of utility between its sub-beings, this transfer is by its nature just. The TJM even ensures intertemporal justice, because by being transdimensional, it can adjust utility between beings alive at different times throughout the life of the universe.

The TJM gives a population of experiencing beings an important characteristic of a single individual: the ability to fairly distribute hardship and pleasure among its members. A single individual might do this by transferring weight from one foot to another and adjusting itself until its position is comfortable. A TJM may do this in much the same manner – by transferring utility-bearing items or services from one sub-being to another, or even by allowing a miserable sub-being to die.

In practice, this last option (causing miserable sub-beings to die) has proven the greatest barrier to producing a functional TJM. No universe simulation equipped with a TJM has yet resulted in a universe with any sentient beings left alive. However, universe creation enthusiasts are hopeful that this problem can be resolved, and a sustainable, just universe can be created in which all experiencing beings achieve a standard of utility above death-desiring misery.


* As our base universe arose through stochastic processes, it is not affected by the moratorium.

Named for the 20th century American philosopher John Rawls, who proposed an influential model for distributive justice. Rawls utilized the concepts of the original position and the veil of ignorance to imagine a society genuinely based on the consent of its members. Putative features of this hypothetical purely-consensual society could then ethically be applied to actual universes to make them more just. The modern conception of the Rawls universe represents, at best, a caricature of Rawls’ method. In a true Rawls universe, all potential beings would need to consent to be part of the universe prior to its creation, blind to their particular future situation.

Advertisements

Written by Sister Y

February 24, 2011 at 8:15 pm

11 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Hahah, sweet.

    I'm wondering about the distinction between market and gladiator universes.

    In a market universe are beings immortal? Or does the survival of beings not require consumption of limited resources? It seems that if it does, refusing to consent to business could be equivalent to force, no?

    I think there are probably examples of this before 2108 CE: If a hunter gatherer in a harsh climate was ostracized from their society (the society not consenting to any transfers with the individual), I imagine that would basically be a death sentence.

    imaginarynums

    February 25, 2011 at 3:34 am

  2. not sure where to put this, but thought you might be interested:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12551753
    (gag)

    Anonymous

    February 25, 2011 at 5:02 am

  3. This:

    “No universe simulation equipped with a TJM has yet resulted in a universe with any sentient beings left alive.”

    Cinches it for me, and somewhat eerily. It's easy to become distracted, living in the world.

    Chip

    February 25, 2011 at 6:39 am

  4. Anonymous February 24, 2011 9:02 PM,

    LOL, “just” 7% wanting help to commit suicide.

    Anonymous

    February 25, 2011 at 7:37 am

  5. And “just” 32% have suicidal thoughts…

    Anonymous

    February 25, 2011 at 7:39 am

  6. Imaginarynums – I meant to imply that, or at least the question. Gladiator systems (like natural selection) at least have the potential to evolve TJM-like characteristics (like empathy). But the “free-er” the market system, the more everything humane is stripped away to reveal only the bare initial distribution – back to a gladiator system once more.

    Anonymous – I wonder what the rate would be for non-locked-in matched controls?

    Sister Y

    February 25, 2011 at 10:35 pm

  7. Just want to thank you, Sister Y, for the link to “My Women, My Guitars”, a fabulous song. Digs deep.

    Rob

    February 28, 2011 at 8:16 pm

  8. Glad you like. It's one of my favorite songs.

    Sister Y

    March 1, 2011 at 4:05 pm

  9. Great one Y,

    The closest I can think of where the TJM can exist in the real world one day – even at the very margins of theoretical probability – is to use transhumanist technologies to redesign our nervous system in three ways

    (a)have no emotions AND
    (b)ability to feel pain AND
    (c)purge the survival instinct from our consciousness (the most important, IMO)

    Note: ALL conditions MUST be present.
    Essentially, we'd be glorified robots, which is all fine and good, I suppose. However, given human nature and the general nature of things, transhumanist technologies are extremely likely to cause many more problems than they solve. I'd argue that- also given human's competitive nature – such technologies would only make our present problems worse; because if we could directly control our DNA to the point of switching sequences as easily as we could switch sound cards, then that creates super-powerful beings who can do whatever the hell they want regardless of how it makes others feel (think of a tiger or lion with the cognitive, speech, and tool-making abilities of a human — AND still would eat any human they catch. Not a pleasant thought, huh). Just reverse the scenario – humans having more strength, intelligence, etc than other humans — and you get the picture.

    So it is that even the TJM would not allow any such inate advantages in a species as competitive and predatory on each other as humans are.

    filrabat

    March 1, 2011 at 10:40 pm

  10. Corection:

    I said: The closest I can think of where the TJM can exist in the real world one day – even at the very margins of theoretical probability

    What I meant was “theoretical possibility

    My apologies for the error.

    filrabat

    March 1, 2011 at 10:42 pm

  11. Yes, the transdimensional justice monster must encompass all experiencing beings down to the worms.

    Sister Y

    March 2, 2011 at 12:20 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: